Contract award - Framework agreement - Uniforms and service outfits for the Kristiansand region Fire and Rescue IKS (KBR)

Zuschlagskriterien

• Quality

  • •Under this award criteria, the contracting authority will assess the quality of the offered goods.
  • •The contracting authority has a separate user committee that will assess the suitability of the offered products in relation to the contracting authority ́s needs. Particular emphasis will be put on functional, technical and aesthetic properties of use.
  • •Tenderers who, after an overall assessment, are assessed as best on quality, will get an unweightd score of 10. Other tenders will be awarded points relatively to the best tender.
  • •Product samples shall be delivered to the Main Fire Station of KBR at Klynga 50, 4630 Kristiansand S.
  • •Opening hours for the reception: from 08:00 - 15:30 When submitting the samples, the samples shall be in neutral closed packages, which should be marked with the following description:
  • •PROCUREMENT - UNIFORM AND OFFICIAL RIGHT FOR KBR, Att: Vidar Ekse

• Quality of electronic ordering system

  • •Under this point the Contracting Authority will carry out an overall assessment of the quality of the electronic system for ordering and account management.
  • •Particular emphasis will be put on the following points:
  • •- Clearness and user friendliness.
  • •- Possibility for mobile/tablet system
  • •- Possibility for notification of delivery (email/sms).
  • •- Universal design of user interface
  • •- User Administration
  • •- Possibilities for reporting possibilities
  • •-Security
  • •The tenderer ́s electronic ordering system is documented by technical and functional documentation of the ordering system.
  • •The contracting authority must, in addition to the evaluation of this criteria, get access to the test environment/demo, free of charge, from the tenderer.
  • •The tenderer who is assessed best in the electronic ordering system will get an unweight score of 10. Other tenders will be awarded points relatively to the best tender.

• 30

  • •Price will be evaluated based on the total sum for the evaluation on the price and product form.
  • •The tenderer with the lowest price will get an unweight score of 10. The other tenderers will have their score reduced relatively according to the following formula: Lowest price/offered price * 10

• Environment

  • •The contracting authority will emphasise whether the item is marked with the Swan Ecolabel or an equivalent environmental label type 1. Equivalent brand schemes are GOTS, Blå Engel, Bra Miljøval or EU Ecolabel. These marking schemes will be fully paid off in the evaluation, just like the Swan Ecolabel.
  • •Other labelling schemes will give a lower score, if the environmental labels are assessed as less relevant or comprehensive. For example, Fairtrade, Cotton Made in Africa (CMiA), Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), Økotex 100, ecologically labelled goods and Greenguard will give 25% value compared to the Swan Ecolabel. Økotex Made in Green gives 35% credit. Products where parts of the product are marked with the Swan Ecolabel or an equivalent environmental label type 1, will give 50% value.
  • •Tenderers who offer other brands will have the legal responsibility to document that their environmental label can be seen as equal/equivalent with the marks specified above.
  • •When calculation of points on this criteria, the score for the individual products will be multiplied by the estimated volume stated in column G in the Product and price form for the individual products.