Framework agreement concerning Meter Container Units

Zuschlagskriterien

• Price

  • •When evaluating 'Price’, the Contracting authority will evaluate the grand total, contract price, cf. the Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices (doc. no. 24/15046-7).
  • •The tenderer must fill in all open items (green cells) in Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

• Solution Description

  • •When evaluating 'Solution Description', The Contracting Authority will evaluate the submitted proposal including the degree to which tenderer complies with Appendix 2: Scope of Work (doc. no. 24/15046-1), including the scope and content of any reservations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance:
  • •a) Modification of container
  • •• It will be evaluated positively if the proposed solution for door assemblies, recommended reinforcements and ventilation systems are fit for purpose.
  • •b) Procedure for replacement
  • •• It is evaluated positively if the procedure for replacement of the meter elements includes clear step by step operations and easy access for all activities required for replacement.
  • •An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.

• Quality management

  • •For the sub-criterion 'Quality management’, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the Tenderer provides assurance as to the quality of production. The evaluation will therefore include the Tenderer’s ability to ensure quality in the entire production and across all interfaces and will be evaluated to the extend the requirements from the technical specification as well as the requirements from standards are met. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance:
  • •a) Fabrication processes:
  • •• It is evaluated positive that manufacturing interfaces are kept at a minimum to prevent unnecessary risk.
  • •b) Inspection and Test Plan (ITP):
  • •• It is evaluated positively that references to internal quality procedures and quality procedures of sub-suppliers are included to ensure that quality requirements are met.
  • •• It is evaluated positively that involvement of third-party inspection is specified in the ITP and time is allowed for the activities.
  • •c) Quality management systems:
  • •• It is evaluated positively if the tenderer and relevant sub-supplier have implemented third-party certified systems to support quality management.
  • •d) Sub-supplier management:
  • •• It is evaluated positively if relevant sub-supplier are assessed and approved.
  • •e) CE marking:
  • •• It is evaluated positively that third-party involvement is specified, and intervention points are identified for the CE marking process.
  • •f) Document control system:
  • •• It is evaluated positively if the document control system includes internal review and approval steps for master record data book (MRB) to reduce the time of follow up during review.
  • •An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.

• Time schedule

  • •For the evaluation of 'Time Schedule’, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, especially concerning:
  • •a) Time schedule for project execution
  • •• It will be evaluated positively if the description and schedule reflect a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities.
  • •• It will be evaluated positively if the schedule reflects sufficient time for 3rd party engagement.
  • •• It will be evaluated positively if the schedule adequately allows for the delivery of supplies provided by the Contracting Authority during the course of the project execution.
  • •An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.