IA_IRM ROV_26-34_FA

Eignungskriterien

• The Applicant is encouraged to provide information about the following key figures in part V of the ESPD based on the latest two audited annual reports: Turnover (revenue), Earnings before tax (EBT), Current assets, Total assets (sum of all assets), Total shareholder’s equity (equity including minority shares), Current liabilities, Intangible assets, Inventories, Trade receivables, Cash and cash equivalents, Trade payables, Total interest-bearing debt (bank loans, draw on revolving credit facilities and corporate bonds). If the Applicant is a newly established legal entity and therefore is not able to submit the latest two audited annual reports the Applicant is encouraged to provide the opening balance. If the Applicant has only one audited annual report at the time of the Prequalification Deadline the Applicant is encouraged to provide this report and is encouraged to inform the Contracting Entity that the Applicant only has one audited annual report. A newly established legal entity is encouraged to consider relying on the economic and financial capacity of the parent company or any other supporting entity. If an Applicant relies on one or more Supporting Entities’ economic and financial capacities the evaluation will be based on the strongest entity’s key figures. It is to be made clear from part II C of the ESPD that the Applicant relies on the economic and financial information of the Supporting Entity by ticking “yes” in section II C of the ESPD: “Does the economic operator re-ly on the capacities of other entities…”. All Applicants are encouraged to submit both their own and the Supporting Entity’s key figures, unless the Applicant and the Supporting Entity have consolidated accounts. If the Applicant and the Supporting Entity have consolidated accounts, the evaluation will be based on the key figures in the latest two audited and consolidated annual reports. If the Supporting Entity does not have consolidated and audited annual reports with the Applicant, it is possible to submit both entities’ key figures based on the two latest audited annual reports together with a financial statement from the auditor of the companies providing the combined key figures for both entities (referred to as consolidated figures in the next sentence), but where intercompany transactions and balances (including loans) are eliminated. In this instance, the evaluation will be based on the consolidated figures in the financial statement from the auditor of the companies. If the Applicant is part of a profit sharing agreement with another legal entity, cf. for example Germany’s Ergebnisabführungsvertrag or equivalent legal arrangement or if the parent company of the Applicant has made a statement according to the Dutch Civil Code article 2:403 (a “403 statement”) or equivalent legal arrangement, the Applicant should declare in the ESPD part II C that it relies on another entity. Further the Supporting Entity shall fill out a separate ESPD. The Applicant or the Supporting Entity is encouraged to explicitly mention the profit sharing agreement/403 statement in the ESPD part V. In case of a profit sharing agreement the evaluation will be based on the figures for the financially strongest entity participating in the arrangement. Only this company is to insert financial figures in the ESPD part V. Consortia are encouraged to provide the key figures based on the latest two audited annual reports of all participating entities in the Consortium. If a Consortium relies on a Supporting Entity. If the key figures are sent for more entities (e.g. two participating entities in the Consortium), the evaluation will be based on the strongest entity’s audited annual reports. The Applicant is encouraged to submit a description of its ownership and corporate structure. If the Applicant is a subsidiary, the Applicant is encouraged to submit the name of the highest possible group parent – being an entity directly or indirectly controlling more than 50 % of the Applicant. The information may be provided in part V of the ESPD. The Contracting Entity re-serves the right to set a deadline for submission of the description of ownership structure after the deadline for request to participate. When the Applicant later is to document the information about the key figures, the Contracting Entity will accept submission of the latest two audited annual reports. It is not required that the Applicant submits copies of the audited annual reports with signatures, but the Contracting Entity reserves the right to request copies of the signed audited annual reports that are with signatures. Assessment of economic and financial capacity: The evaluation of the Applicant’s economic and financial capacity will be based upon the in-formation submitted and will be an assessment of the following three areas (in prioritized or-der), all for the latest audited annual report unless otherwise mentioned below: Capital structure, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Estimated yearly value of the framework agreement to equity, Solvency ratio, (equity / total assets), Change of Tangible Net Worth, (equity less intangible assets) (based on both audited annual reports) and Debt to equity* Debt to earnings*, b) Liquidity, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Current ratio (current assets / current liabilities), Average working capital turnover (Turnover (Revenue)/Average working capital) (working capital calculated as the sum of inventories, trade receivables and cash and cash equivalents, subtracting trade payables), (based on both audited annual reports)* Current ratio (the oldest of the two latest audited annual reports)* (c) Profitability. (The two criteria have equal priority): Earnings before tax to total assets, Earnings before tax margin (Earnings before tax (EBT) / Turnover (revenue) (based on both audited annual reports).

• Information about the Applicant’s experience. The Applicant is encouraged to provide the following information with the object of the Con-tract in Annex I (Response form) and/or part V of the eESPD about the Applicant’s completed experience with the type of work as specified in section 2.4 and further provide information about technical experience with subjects as per below bullet list. Offshore IRM scope of services in the North Sea: Project Management and engineering, CSWIP Inspectors and coordinators, WROW, OROV and Mini ROV operations from DP operated vessel, Operation and management of DP2 vessels, Vessel inspection/auditing in compliance with OCIMF OVID. The Applicant is encouraged to submit a maximum of 3 references regarding experience with the object of the Contract. If more references are submitted, only the most recent references up to the maximum number of references will be considered. No additional documentation for the selection criterion for experience will be required from the Applicant. However, the Contracting Entity reserves the right to contact the Applicant or relevant third parties for verification of the information stated in the description(s). Assessment of experience. The Applicant’s experience will be based on the information submitted and will be an overall assessment of: (a) Similarity to the Contract, including the following elements: The more recent the references for IRM ROV scope of works in the North Sea are, the more positive the references will be considered. (b) In addition to this, it will be considered as favourable if references are within the offshore oil and gas industry. The Applicant is encouraged to provide information for each reference: Project name, Project location, Name of customer, Time of execution and duration of field work, A short concise description of the deliveries including description of Applicants’ role and responsibility.

• The Applicant is encouraged to provide information about the following key figures in part V of the ESPD based on the latest two audited annual reports: Turnover (revenue), Earnings before tax (EBT), Current assets, Total assets (sum of all assets), Total shareholder’s equity (equity including minority shares), Current liabilities, Intangible assets, Inventories, Trade receivables, Cash and cash equivalents, Trade payables, Total interest-bearing debt (bank loans, draw on revolving credit facilities and corporate bonds). If the Applicant is a newly established legal entity and therefore is not able to submit the latest two audited annual reports the Applicant is encouraged to provide the opening balance. If the Applicant has only one audited annual report at the time of the Prequalification Deadline the Applicant is encouraged to provide this report and is encouraged to inform the Contracting Entity that the Applicant only has one audited annual report. A newly established legal entity is encouraged to consider relying on the economic and financial capacity of the parent company or any other supporting entity. If an Applicant relies on one or more Supporting Entities’ economic and financial capacities the evaluation will be based on the strongest entity’s key figures. It is to be made clear from part II C of the ESPD that the Applicant relies on the economic and financial information of the Supporting Entity by ticking “yes” in section II C of the ESPD: “Does the economic operator re-ly on the capacities of other entities…”. All Applicants are encouraged to submit both their own and the Supporting Entity’s key figures, unless the Applicant and the Supporting Entity have consolidated accounts. If the Applicant and the Supporting Entity have consolidated accounts, the evaluation will be based on the key figures in the latest two audited and consolidated annual reports. If the Supporting Entity does not have consolidated and audited annual reports with the Applicant, it is possible to submit both entities’ key figures based on the two latest audited annual reports together with a financial statement from the auditor of the companies providing the combined key figures for both entities (referred to as consolidated figures in the next sentence), but where intercompany transactions and balances (including loans) are eliminated. In this instance, the evaluation will be based on the consolidated figures in the financial statement from the auditor of the companies. If the Applicant is part of a profit sharing agreement with another legal entity, cf. for example Germany’s Ergebnisabführungsvertrag or equivalent legal arrangement or if the parent company of the Applicant has made a statement according to the Dutch Civil Code article 2:403 (a “403 statement”) or equivalent legal arrangement, the Applicant should declare in the ESPD part II C that it relies on another entity. Further the Supporting Entity shall fill out a separate ESPD. The Applicant or the Supporting Entity is encouraged to explicitly mention the profit sharing agreement/403 statement in the ESPD part V. In case of a profit sharing agreement the evaluation will be based on the figures for the financially strongest entity participating in the arrangement. Only this company is to insert financial figures in the ESPD part V. Consortia are encouraged to provide the key figures based on the latest two audited annual reports of all participating entities in the Consortium. If a Consortium relies on a Supporting Entity. If the key figures are sent for more entities (e.g. two participating entities in the Consortium), the evaluation will be based on the strongest entity’s audited annual reports. The Applicant is encouraged to submit a description of its ownership and corporate structure. If the Applicant is a subsidiary, the Applicant is encouraged to submit the name of the highest possible group parent – being an entity directly or indirectly controlling more than 50 % of the Applicant. The information may be provided in part V of the ESPD. The Contracting Entity re-serves the right to set a deadline for submission of the description of ownership structure after the deadline for request to participate. When the Applicant later is to document the information about the key figures, the Contracting Entity will accept submission of the latest two audited annual reports. It is not required that the Applicant submits copies of the audited annual reports with signatures, but the Contracting Entity reserves the right to request copies of the signed audited annual reports that are with signatures. Assessment of economic and financial capacity: The evaluation of the Applicant’s economic and financial capacity will be based upon the in-formation submitted and will be an assessment of the following three areas (in prioritized or-der), all for the latest audited annual report unless otherwise mentioned below: Capital structure, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Estimated yearly value of the framework agreement to equity, Solvency ratio, (equity / total assets), Change of Tangible Net Worth, (equity less intangible assets) (based on both audited annual reports) and Debt to equity* Debt to earnings*, b) Liquidity, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Current ratio (current assets / current liabilities), Average working capital turnover (Turnover (Revenue)/Average working capital) (working capital calculated as the sum of inventories, trade receivables and cash and cash equivalents, subtracting trade payables), (based on both audited annual reports)* Current ratio (the oldest of the two latest audited annual reports)* (c) Profitability. (The two criteria have equal priority): Earnings before tax to total assets, Earnings before tax margin (Earnings before tax (EBT) / Turnover (revenue) (based on both audited annual reports).

• Information about the Applicant’s experience. The Applicant is encouraged to provide the following information with the object of the Con-tract in Annex I (Response form) and/or part V of the eESPD about the Applicant’s completed experience with the type of work as specified in section 2.4 and further provide information about technical experience with subjects as per below bullet list. Offshore IRM scope of services in the North Sea: Project Management and engineering, CSWIP Inspectors and coordinators, WROW, OROV and Mini ROV operations from DP operated vessel, Operation and management of DP2 vessels, Vessel inspection/auditing in compliance with OCIMF OVID. The Applicant is encouraged to submit a maximum of 3 references regarding experience with the object of the Contract. If more references are submitted, only the most recent references up to the maximum number of references will be considered. No additional documentation for the selection criterion for experience will be required from the Applicant. However, the Contracting Entity reserves the right to contact the Applicant or relevant third parties for verification of the information stated in the description(s). Assessment of experience. The Applicant’s experience will be based on the information submitted and will be an overall assessment of: (a) Similarity to the Contract, including the following elements: The more recent the references for IRM ROV scope of works in the North Sea are, the more positive the references will be considered. (b) In addition to this, it will be considered as favourable if references are within the offshore oil and gas industry. The Applicant is encouraged to provide information for each reference: Project name, Project location, Name of customer, Time of execution and duration of field work, A short concise description of the deliveries including description of Applicants’ role and responsibility.

Zuschlagskriterien

• The most economically advantageous Tender will be identified on the basis of the award criterion best price-quality ratio as described further in the tender documents.

• Technical Solution: Vessel specification and capabilities, Methodology and Resources and Data Management as described further in the tender documents.

• Health, Safety and Environment: QHSE Plan, E-targets and relevant E-initiatives and QHS targets and relevant QHS Initiatives as described further in the tender documents.

• Contractual terms: Risk exposure as described further in the tender documents.