RegioSpeicher Mosbach - EPC - Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) of a lithium-ion battery storage facility with 10 MW of active power consumption

Eignungskriterien

• Only the references (technical and professional ability) are decisive for the assessment of suitability. The information and evidence listed under TL are used to assess the references. A maximum total of 1,000 points can be achieved here. The proofs PL and WL are not evaluated qualitatively. The evaluation of technical and professional ability is carried out in a relative comparison of the applicants with each other on the basis of the following scale/grade levels. The maximum number of points achievable is multiplied by the weighting factor (percentage) achieved in each case: - 100% = very good: Applicant meets the requirements with regard to the suitability criterion to the very highest degree, - 80% = good: Applicant meets the requirements of the suitability criterion to the highest degree, - 60% = fully satisfactory: applicant meets the requirements of the suitability criterion to a high degree, - 40% = satisfactory: applicant satisfactorily fulfills the requirements with regard to the suitability criterion, - 20% = sufficient: the applicant meets the requirements of the suitability criterion to a just sufficient degree. In the range between 0% and 100%, intermediate grade levels can be formed (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%) to take into account a tendency towards the higher grade level in each case. An evaluation of a suitability criterion (technical and professional ability) with 20% or less would correspond to a complete non-fulfillment of the respective suitability criterion, which would result in the exclusion of the participation application (knock-out criterion). These are suitability criteria, not award criteria. If several bidders achieve the same total score and the number of bidders exceeds the planned number of bidders to be invited to negotiate, the contracting authorities reserve the option to draw lots for the negotiation procedure among the remaining bidders with equal scores.

• • •The documents which the applicant must enclose with its application to participate are listed below. For this purpose, the applicant must use the forms (application documents) provided by the contracting authorities. Submitted supporting documents must still be valid
  • •insofar as requirements are made regarding up-to dateness, the date refers to the date of publication of this notice. With their request to participate, applicants must submit the following documents: PL1. Self-declaration regarding exclusion criteria (Sec. 123, 124 GWB). A form is included in the application documents. PL2. Self-declaration on the company with information on the company name, legal form, registered office, object, management of the company, company structure (e.g. parent companies, group affiliation, branches - organization chart), with presentation of the company and capital relationships of the applicant and, if applicable, the responsible branch office and query on SME status. A form is included in the application documents. PL3. Self-declaration on the 5th EU package of sanctions ("RUS sanctions"). A form is included in the application documents. In the case of applicant consortia, the evidence must be provided by each member of the applicant consortium. A loan of qualifications in accordance with Section 47 SektVO for the purpose of demonstrating PL is not permitted. If an applicant is unable to provide any required evidence for a valid reason, it may demonstrate its ability to perform by submitting other appropriate evidence. The contracting authorities reserve the right to request further self-declarations and certificates for applicants selected at the end of the call for competition and any subcontractors upon separate request with the submission of the offer.

• WL1. Self-declaration concerning the economic and financial capabilities of the applicant, in particular statement of total turnover of the applicant of the last 3 financial years. The form in the application documents shall be used. WL2. Selfdeclaration of the annual turnover of the applicant for services comparable with the services put out in this tender (the decisive factor for comparability is turnover for engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) with regard to Battery Energy Storage System projects) in the last 3 financial years. In the case of applicant consortia, the evidence can be provided for the applicant consortium in total. In the case of a loan of qualifications pursuant to Section 47 SektVO, particularly where subcontractors are involved, the relevant supporting documents must be submitted for the relevant companies. If an applicant is unable to provide any required evidence for a valid reason, it may demonstrate its ability to perform by submitting other appropriate evidence. The contracting authorities reserve the right to request further self-declarations and certificates for applicants selected at the end of the call for competition and any subcontractors upon separate request with the submission of the offer. The contracting authorities reserve the right to obtain financial information on the applicant.

• TL. Experience in the execution of comparable construction services, evidenced by reference projects (realized similar projects in connection with engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) with regard to Battery Energy Storage Systems in the last maximum of 5 years (self-declarations)). Similar means a reference project with a minimum capacity of 5 MWh. The reference projects must have been carried out or completed within the last 5 years. In the case of applicant consortia, corresponding information can be submitted for the applicant consortium as a whole. In the case of a loan of qualifications pursuant to Section 47 SektVO, particularly where subcontractors are involved, the relevant supporting documents must be submitted for the relevant companies. The references are to be submitted in accordance with the form from the application documents with the information specified therein, in particular including project start and actual operating period. If possible, please submit no more than 5 references and sort them according to their relevance and comparability with the subject of the tender. In individual cases, the contracting authorities may request the submission of reference certificates from the reference clients. Minimum level of standard: The bidder must have realized at least two similar reference projects of comparable size in the European Union or UK (successful commissioning of the relevant system).

• Valid certification for a quality management system (e.g., in accordance with DIN EN ISO 9001) or an equivalent system. The scope of the certificate must cover the services specified in this request for proposals (e.g., EPC-contractor, system integration, manufacturing). The certificate must be issued by an accredited certification body and must still be valid as of the application deadline.